Tizora

By company stage

  • Startup MVPsFrom idea to a launched first version
  • Mid-Market SolutionsScale a product that already has customers
  • Enterprise SolutionsAI on top of complex existing systems
Products
ReCom AIA 24/7 AI sales agent for online storesLicense Plate RecognitionAn ALPR / ANPR API that reads vehicle plates
All Products →
Case Studies
Aviation
Fintech
Healthcare
Parking & Enforcement
eCommerce
All Industries

Cybersecurity

  • AI Security AssessmentTest LLM apps and agents before attackers do
  • Application SecurityWeb, mobile and API security testing
  • Shopify App VAPTSecurity testing for Shopify apps

Compliance

  • DPDP ComplianceIndia's Digital Personal Data Protection Act
  • VPAT & AccessibilityWCAG, Section 508 and ACR reports
  • Shopify App VPATAccessibility reports for Shopify apps
About
About Tizora
Careers
Insights
Blog
AI Trends
Ebooks
ContactContact
Products
About
Insights
ContactContact
  1. Home
  2. Cybersecurity
  3. Application Security Services

Security that ships with the code, not after it.

Application security services built into your SDLC

Most breaches don’t start with a zero-day — they start with a broken access control check, an unpatched dependency, or a misconfigured cloud bucket that shipped because no one was looking for it. We build application security into your SDLC so those gaps get caught in code review, not in an incident report.

Get an application security assessment
Hero image

Tizora's application security services find and fix vulnerabilities in web applications and APIs through manual code review, penetration testing and automated scanning in your CI pipeline. Every finding is manually verified against the OWASP Top 10:2025 and ASVS 5.0, then re-tested after it is fixed.

WHAT WE DO

What our application security services cover

Code editor with one line flagged under a magnifying glass during secure code review01 / 04
OUR COVERAGE MODEL

Application security testing that mirrors how software actually gets built

SAST+ DAST + SCAStatic analysis, dynamic testing, and software composition analysis, cross-checked against manual review.
OWASPTop 10:2025 and ASVS 5.0 alignedEvery assessment is structured against the OWASP Top 10:2025 and the Application Security Verification Standard 5.0.
Full SDLCdesign to deployThreat modeling at design time, not just a scan the week before launch.
Manualexploit verificationEvery automated finding is manually verified — no report full of unconfirmed false positives.

Vulnerability scan vs penetration test vs secure code review

QuestionVulnerability scanPenetration testSecure code review
How it worksVulnerability scanAutomated tools flag known vulnerability signaturesPenetration testA tester attacks the running application and APIs like a real attackerSecure code reviewA reviewer reads authentication, authorization, session and data-access code line by line
Best atVulnerability scanFast, broad coverage of known issuesPenetration testChained findings and proving what is actually exploitableSecure code reviewLogic and authorization flaws that need an understanding of intent
MissesVulnerability scanBusiness-logic flaws; produces false positivesPenetration testCode paths it never reachesSecure code reviewRuntime and configuration issues
When to useVulnerability scanContinuously, in CI on every pull requestPenetration testAt major releases, or at least annuallySecure code reviewFor new features and high-risk code

Swipe to compare all 4 →

ENGINEERING PRACTICE

Secure SDLC: secure by default, not secure by exception

The cheapest vulnerability to fix is the one that never ships. We work with engineering teams to move security decisions earlier, so fewer findings surface after the fact.

Threat modeling at design time

New features get a lightweight threat model before implementation, so authorization boundaries and trust assumptions are explicit from day one.

SAST & SCA in CI

Static analysis and dependency scanning run on every pull request, catching known vulnerability classes before they merge — not at the next quarterly audit.

Secrets & configuration hygiene

No credentials in source control, no default configurations in production — enforced through tooling, not a policy document no one reads.

Incident-ready logging

Authentication events, authorization failures, and administrative actions are logged in a form that actually supports investigation, not just uptime monitoring.

Secure SDLC pipeline: code, branch, build and deploy stages, each passing a security check

Mapped to the OWASP Top 10:2025 and API Security Top 10

Every engagement is mapped to the OWASP Top 10:2025, with API security testing against the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023) and infrastructure risks the standard list doesn’t fully capture. LLM features and AI agents need their own AI security assessment.

Three user role cards: two pass the access check and one is blocked with a lock
0101

Application layer

  • Broken access control (A01)
  • Injection, SQL, NoSQL and command (A05)
  • Authentication failures (A07)
  • Insecure design and business logic (A06)
  • Cryptographic failures (A04)
  • Mishandling of exceptional conditions (A10)

Application layer 

Where most exploited flaws start: broken access control, injection, authentication failures, insecure design and business logic, cryptographic failures, and mishandling of exceptional conditions. 

A client connected through an authorization shield to an API response, with a sensitive field blocked
0202

API and integration layer

  • Broken object and function level authorization (API1, API5)
  • Broken object property level authorization, including excessive data exposure (API3)
  • Server-side request forgery (API7)
  • Unrestricted resource consumption (API4)

API and integration layer 

How your services talk to each other: object, function and property level authorization, server-side request forgery, and unrestricted resource consumption. 

Server stack with one misconfigured server flagged, next to a code, build and security-check pipeline
0303

Infrastructure and pipeline

  • Security misconfiguration (A02)
  • Software supply chain failures (A03)
  • Software or data integrity failures in CI/CD and builds (A08)
  • Security logging and alerting failures (A09)

Infrastructure and pipeline 

What ships and runs the code: security misconfiguration, software supply chain failures, software or data integrity failures in CI/CD and builds, and security logging and alerting failures. 

Where real breaches start

The vulnerabilities that actually get exploited are rarely the exotic ones.

They’re the access-control check that works for one role and not another, shipped by a team that never had a security engineer look at the design before it went out.

ENGAGEMENT

How an application security assessment runs, step by step

Scoping & threat modeling

We map the application’s attack surface, trust boundaries, and highest-value assets before testing begins, so effort goes where the real risk is.

User, database and server inside a dashed trust boundary, with a shield check

Automated & manual testing

SAST, DAST, and SCA scans run alongside manual code review and hands-on penetration testing against the live application and its APIs.

A scan line passing across lines of code, with one line highlighted

Verified findings & impact

Every finding is manually verified and rated by real exploitability and business impact — no unconfirmed scanner noise in the final report.

Findings ranked by severity as coloured bars, each with a verified check

Remediation & re-test

We work directly with engineers to fix confirmed issues, then re-test to verify closure before the engagement is marked complete.

Code change with a removed line and added lines, next to a re-test loop

What you get from our application security services

Every verified finding in the report follows the same structure, so engineers can act on it without re-triaging.

Finding

A short, plain title for the issue.

OWASP category

The OWASP Top 10:2025 or API Security Top 10 entry it maps to, such as A01:2025 Broken Access Control.

Layer

Where it lives: application, API or infrastructure.

Severity and exploitability

How serious the issue is and who could exploit it.

How it was verified

A short reproduction showing the issue is real.

Fix

The code or configuration change we recommend.

Re-test

Whether the issue is closed or still open after we re-test.

FAQ

Application security services FAQs

Application security services find and fix vulnerabilities in web applications and APIs. Tizora's services combine manual secure code review, penetration testing and automated scanning in your CI pipeline, with every finding manually verified, fixed with your engineers and re-tested.

Every assessment is structured against the OWASP Top 10:2025 and the OWASP Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS) 5.0, with APIs tested against the OWASP API Security Top 10.

SAST analyzes source code without running it, DAST tests the running application from the outside, and SCA checks third-party and open-source components for known vulnerabilities. We run all three and cross-check them with manual review, because none of them reliably finds business-logic or authorization flaws.

A scan is automated and flags known vulnerability signatures — it’s fast and broad but generates false positives and misses business-logic flaws entirely. A penetration test adds a human who thinks like an attacker: chaining low-severity issues together, testing authorization boundaries a scanner can’t reason about, and confirming what’s actually exploitable. We use both — automation for coverage, manual testing for the findings that matter.

We strongly prefer a staging or dedicated test environment that mirrors production, to avoid any risk of disruption. Where production testing is required — for issues that only reproduce there — we scope it carefully with rate limits and a rollback plan agreed in advance.

Every automated finding is manually verified before it makes it into the report. If we can’t reproduce a real impact, it doesn’t get listed as a vulnerability — it gets noted separately as informational, if at all. You get a report you can act on, not one you have to triage yourself.

Yes. We commonly wire SAST and dependency scanning directly into your pull-request checks, so known vulnerability classes are caught before merge rather than in a periodic audit months later.

For most teams shipping regularly, we recommend a full assessment at major release milestones or at least annually, with continuous automated scanning in between. Applications handling sensitive data or operating in regulated industries often warrant more frequent manual review.

Can't find what you're looking for? Reach out to our engineering team directly.

Contact engineeringContact engineering

Know where your application actually stands.

From a single focused penetration test to full SDLC integration, we’ll help you find and fix what matters before it becomes an incident report.

Get an application security assessment
Tizora engineer coding at a laptop, with labels for scalable architecture, AI integration, enterprise systems, from ideas to impact and real results

Engineering the future of AI, cloud architecture, and deterministic systems for enterprise businesses.

LinkedInInstagram

What We Do

  • Startup MVPs
  • Mid-Market
  • Enterprise

Products

  • ReCom AI
  • License Plate Recognition
  • All Products

Work

  • Case Studies
  • Aviation
  • Fintech
  • Healthcare
  • Parking & Enforcement
  • eCommerce
  • All Industries

Security & Compliance

  • AI Security Assessment
  • Application Security
  • Shopify App VAPT
  • DPDP Compliance
  • VPAT & Accessibility
  • Shopify App VPAT

Company & Insights

  • About
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • AI Trends
  • Ebooks

Contact

  • sales@tizora.ai
  • +1 339-337-6252
  • +91 92747-37954
© 2026 Tizora, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy