Do you test production systems or only staging?

We strongly prefer a staging or dedicated test environment that mirrors production, to avoid any risk of disruption. Where production testing is required — for issues that only reproduce there — we scope it carefully with rate limits and a rollback plan agreed in advance.

How do you avoid a report full of low-value scanner noise?

Every automated finding is manually verified before it makes it into the report. If we can’t reproduce a real impact, it doesn’t get listed as a vulnerability — it gets noted separately as informational, if at all. You get a report you can act on, not one you have to triage yourself.

Can this integrate with our existing CI/CD pipeline?

Yes. We commonly wire SAST and dependency scanning directly into your pull-request checks, so known vulnerability classes are caught before merge rather than in a periodic audit months later.

How often should we run a full assessment?

For most teams shipping regularly, we recommend a full assessment at major release milestones or at least annually, with continuous automated scanning in between. Applications handling sensitive data or operating in regulated industries often warrant more frequent manual review.

APPLICATION SECURITY

Security that shipswith the code, not after it.

Most breaches don’t start with a zero-day — they start with a broken access control check, an unpatched dependency, or a misconfigured cloud bucket that shipped because no one was looking for it. We build application security into your SDLC so those gaps get caught in code review, not in an incident report.

Get a security assessment

WHAT WE DO

Four layers of defense, working together.

OUR COVERAGE MODEL

Security testing that mirrors how software actually gets built.

SAST+ DAST + SCAStatic analysis, dynamic testing, and software composition analysis, cross-checked against manual review.

OWASPTop 10 & ASVS alignedEvery assessment is structured against the OWASP Top 10 and Application Security Verification Standard.

Full SDLCdesign to deployThreat modeling at design time, not just a scan the week before launch.

Manualexploit verificationEvery automated finding is manually verified — no report full of unconfirmed false positives.

ENGINEERING PRACTICE

Secure by default, not secure by exception.

The cheapest vulnerability to fix is the one that never ships. We work with engineering teams to move security decisions earlier, so fewer findings surface after the fact.

Threat modeling at design time

New features get a lightweight threat model before implementation, so authorization boundaries and trust assumptions are explicit from day one.

SAST & SCA in CI

Static analysis and dependency scanning run on every pull request, catching known vulnerability classes before they merge — not at the next quarterly audit.

Secrets & configuration hygiene

No credentials in source control, no default configurations in production — enforced through tooling, not a policy document no one reads.

Incident-ready logging

Authentication events, authorization failures, and administrative actions are logged in a form that actually supports investigation, not just uptime monitoring.

Secure by default, not secure by exception.

Structured against the risks that actually get exploited.

Every engagement is mapped to the OWASP Top 10 and extended to cover API-specific and infrastructure risks the standard list doesn’t fully capture.

Application layer

Broken access control
Injection (SQL, NoSQL, command)
Authentication & session flaws
Insecure design & business logic

API & integration layer

Broken object & function-level authorization
Excessive data exposure
Server-side request forgery (SSRF)
Rate limiting & resource exhaustion

Infrastructure & pipeline

Security misconfiguration
Vulnerable & outdated components
CI/CD & build pipeline integrity
Logging & monitoring gaps

The vulnerabilities that actually get exploited are rarely the exotic ones. They’re the access-control check that works for one role and not another, shipped by a team that never had a security engineer look at the design before it went out.

Tizora EngineeringApplication Security Practice

Tizora

ENGAGEMENT

How an application security engagement runs.

Scoping & threat modeling

We map the application’s attack surface, trust boundaries, and highest-value assets before testing begins, so effort goes where the real risk is.

Automated & manual testing

SAST, DAST, and SCA scans run alongside manual code review and hands-on penetration testing against the live application and its APIs.

Verified findings & impact

Every finding is manually verified and rated by real exploitability and business impact — no unconfirmed scanner noise in the final report.

Remediation & re-test

We work directly with engineers to fix confirmed issues, then re-test to verify closure before the engagement is marked complete.

FAQ

Common questions on application security engagements.

Can't find what you're looking for? Reach out to our engineering team directly.

A scan is automated and flags known vulnerability signatures — it’s fast and broad but generates false positives and misses business-logic flaws entirely. A penetration test adds a human who thinks like an attacker: chaining low-severity issues together, testing authorization boundaries a scanner can’t reason about, and confirming what’s actually exploitable. We use both — automation for coverage, manual testing for the findings that matter.

Can't find what you're looking for? Reach out to our engineering team directly.

Know where your application actually stands.

From a single focused penetration test to full SDLC integration, we’ll help you find and fix what matters before it becomes an incident report.

Get a security assessment

Security that shipswith the code, not after it.

Secure by default, not secure by exception.

The cheapest vulnerability to fix is the one that never ships. We work with engineering teams to move security decisions earlier, so fewer findings surface after the fact.